<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Religious Freedom Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Exposing the Enemies of the Church of Scientology!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:04:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on RFW RESPONDS TO ITS READERS! by Doobie Doobie Doo</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/25/rfw-responds-to-its-readers/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Doobie Doobie Doo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/25/rfw-responds-to-its-readers/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Lame Losers in Scientology. Moxon drools, Rinder bailed, Miscavige pees his pants, Joel Phillips licked Hubbard&#039;s balls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lame Losers in Scientology. Moxon drools, Rinder bailed, Miscavige pees his pants, Joel Phillips licked Hubbard&#8217;s balls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Said It Would Not Work! by confused?</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>confused?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 06:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>&quot;Computer engineers still can’t make a computer that cannot detect hate mail from pederasts.&quot;
Double negative there, so all computers detect hate mail from pederasts? Isn&#039;t that what you want? or would you like a special computer that allows all hate mail?

Also physics says that bumblebees can fly, the following is pulled from wikipedia: It is believed that the calculations which purported to show that bumblebees cannot fly are based upon a simplified linear treatment of oscillating aerofoils. The method assumes small amplitude oscillations without flow separation. This ignores the effect of dynamic stall, an airflow separation inducing a large vortex above the wing, which briefly produces several times the lift of the aerofoil in regular flight. More sophisticated aerodynamic analysis shows that the bumblebee can fly because its wings encounter dynamic stall in every oscillation cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Computer engineers still can’t make a computer that cannot detect hate mail from pederasts.&#8221;<br />
Double negative there, so all computers detect hate mail from pederasts? Isn&#8217;t that what you want? or would you like a special computer that allows all hate mail?</p>
<p>Also physics says that bumblebees can fly, the following is pulled from wikipedia: It is believed that the calculations which purported to show that bumblebees cannot fly are based upon a simplified linear treatment of oscillating aerofoils. The method assumes small amplitude oscillations without flow separation. This ignores the effect of dynamic stall, an airflow separation inducing a large vortex above the wing, which briefly produces several times the lift of the aerofoil in regular flight. More sophisticated aerodynamic analysis shows that the bumblebee can fly because its wings encounter dynamic stall in every oscillation cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Standing Tall Against the Stalinist Wizards from Outer Space! by Religious Freedom Watch</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/29/standing-tall-against-the-stalinist-wizards-from-outer-space/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Religious Freedom Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 06:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/29/standing-tall-against-the-stalinist-wizards-from-outer-space/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>religiousfreedomwatch.org is a hate site owned and operated by the cult of Scientology.  If you want to see the real &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.info&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;religious freedom watch&lt;/a&gt; you can view it here:

http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>religiousfreedomwatch.org is a hate site owned and operated by the cult of Scientology.  If you want to see the real <a href="http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.info" rel="nofollow">religious freedom watch</a> you can view it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.info</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Standing Tall Against the Stalinist Wizards from Outer Space! by inchdeep</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/29/standing-tall-against-the-stalinist-wizards-from-outer-space/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>inchdeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/29/standing-tall-against-the-stalinist-wizards-from-outer-space/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Bubble bees fly because God says so. Scientology is a lie also because God says so. You believe in Scientology because your tinfoil hat has a hole in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bubble bees fly because God says so. Scientology is a lie also because God says so. You believe in Scientology because your tinfoil hat has a hole in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Said It Would Not Work! by ebaum</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>ebaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>We can make planes that don&#039;t crash. We DO make them. Can they be used correctly, is the question.

And although we can&#039;t make gasoline out of water, we can make HYDROGEN, which (gasp) can be used to powered cars that don&#039;t pollute. We&#039;re just perfecting it.

I&#039;m glad you&#039;re not a scientist or anything. Good lord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can make planes that don&#8217;t crash. We DO make them. Can they be used correctly, is the question.</p>
<p>And although we can&#8217;t make gasoline out of water, we can make HYDROGEN, which (gasp) can be used to powered cars that don&#8217;t pollute. We&#8217;re just perfecting it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re not a scientist or anything. Good lord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Said It Would Not Work! by Citizen</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Seriously, if someone wanted to make a great parody article about how Scientologists are stereotyped by internet denizens, all they would need to do is copy and paste this exact article - word for word.

&quot;Bumblebees fly and Scientologists are using the E-Meter to solve the world’s problems on a daily basis.&quot; Hah!

&quot;But, anyone and I do mean anyone can learn to use an E-Meter.&quot; Case in point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, if someone wanted to make a great parody article about how Scientologists are stereotyped by internet denizens, all they would need to do is copy and paste this exact article &#8211; word for word.</p>
<p>&#8220;Bumblebees fly and Scientologists are using the E-Meter to solve the world’s problems on a daily basis.&#8221; Hah!</p>
<p>&#8220;But, anyone and I do mean anyone can learn to use an E-Meter.&#8221; Case in point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Said It Would Not Work! by asif</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>asif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Actually..   You are wrong. 

Educate yourself (those who are permitted.  To those who aren&#039;t.. I&#039;m so sorry.)

http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040911/mathtrek.asp

http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a5_045.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually..   You are wrong. </p>
<p>Educate yourself (those who are permitted.  To those who aren&#8217;t.. I&#8217;m so sorry.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040911/mathtrek.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040911/mathtrek.asp</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a5_045.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a5_045.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RFW Special Report: Terror in America by Anon</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/rfw-special-report-terror-in-america/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/rfw-special-report-terror-in-america/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Paul horner is member of this organisation so his comment is meaningless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul horner is member of this organisation so his comment is meaningless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Behind the Scenes at Religious Freedom Watch by Anonymousey</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/22/behind-the-scenes-at-religious-freedom-watch/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymousey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/22/behind-the-scenes-at-religious-freedom-watch/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Name these companies? how come we never here of these companies thanking you or of the US goverment citing your eveidence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Name these companies? how come we never here of these companies thanking you or of the US goverment citing your eveidence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Said It Would Not Work! by djbjbfbwf</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>djbjbfbwf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Ok, so engineers cannot understand why the bumblebee works, therefore the e-meter must be correct. That argument is so weak I am actually wondering if this is a wind-up. Attacking the validity of the e-meter is not a violation of religious freedom, it is a very valid response to a piece of technology which has had no independent peer review, no double-blind tests, no proper research at all.

I wonder at how ridiculous this all seems and how anyone can take it seriously, then I realise that it is the way of all religions. Feel free to practice whatever belief you like, but one: do not stifle criticism, if you do it will be your downfall, two: be honest about the reality of Scientology, don&#039;t wait till people are fully indoctrinated to tell them all the stuff about nuking volcanoes and Xenu etc. and 3: do not use suppressive tactics or litigious methods, you will only win enemies.

Oh yes, and explain Lisa McPhearson...

Knowledge is free.

Salvation has no price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so engineers cannot understand why the bumblebee works, therefore the e-meter must be correct. That argument is so weak I am actually wondering if this is a wind-up. Attacking the validity of the e-meter is not a violation of religious freedom, it is a very valid response to a piece of technology which has had no independent peer review, no double-blind tests, no proper research at all.</p>
<p>I wonder at how ridiculous this all seems and how anyone can take it seriously, then I realise that it is the way of all religions. Feel free to practice whatever belief you like, but one: do not stifle criticism, if you do it will be your downfall, two: be honest about the reality of Scientology, don&#8217;t wait till people are fully indoctrinated to tell them all the stuff about nuking volcanoes and Xenu etc. and 3: do not use suppressive tactics or litigious methods, you will only win enemies.</p>
<p>Oh yes, and explain Lisa McPhearson&#8230;</p>
<p>Knowledge is free.</p>
<p>Salvation has no price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
