<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They Said It Would Not Work!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/</link>
	<description>Exposing the Enemies of the Church of Scientology!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:04:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: confused?</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>confused?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 06:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>&quot;Computer engineers still can’t make a computer that cannot detect hate mail from pederasts.&quot;
Double negative there, so all computers detect hate mail from pederasts? Isn&#039;t that what you want? or would you like a special computer that allows all hate mail?

Also physics says that bumblebees can fly, the following is pulled from wikipedia: It is believed that the calculations which purported to show that bumblebees cannot fly are based upon a simplified linear treatment of oscillating aerofoils. The method assumes small amplitude oscillations without flow separation. This ignores the effect of dynamic stall, an airflow separation inducing a large vortex above the wing, which briefly produces several times the lift of the aerofoil in regular flight. More sophisticated aerodynamic analysis shows that the bumblebee can fly because its wings encounter dynamic stall in every oscillation cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Computer engineers still can’t make a computer that cannot detect hate mail from pederasts.&#8221;<br />
Double negative there, so all computers detect hate mail from pederasts? Isn&#8217;t that what you want? or would you like a special computer that allows all hate mail?</p>
<p>Also physics says that bumblebees can fly, the following is pulled from wikipedia: It is believed that the calculations which purported to show that bumblebees cannot fly are based upon a simplified linear treatment of oscillating aerofoils. The method assumes small amplitude oscillations without flow separation. This ignores the effect of dynamic stall, an airflow separation inducing a large vortex above the wing, which briefly produces several times the lift of the aerofoil in regular flight. More sophisticated aerodynamic analysis shows that the bumblebee can fly because its wings encounter dynamic stall in every oscillation cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebaum</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>ebaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>We can make planes that don&#039;t crash. We DO make them. Can they be used correctly, is the question.

And although we can&#039;t make gasoline out of water, we can make HYDROGEN, which (gasp) can be used to powered cars that don&#039;t pollute. We&#039;re just perfecting it.

I&#039;m glad you&#039;re not a scientist or anything. Good lord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can make planes that don&#8217;t crash. We DO make them. Can they be used correctly, is the question.</p>
<p>And although we can&#8217;t make gasoline out of water, we can make HYDROGEN, which (gasp) can be used to powered cars that don&#8217;t pollute. We&#8217;re just perfecting it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re not a scientist or anything. Good lord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Seriously, if someone wanted to make a great parody article about how Scientologists are stereotyped by internet denizens, all they would need to do is copy and paste this exact article - word for word.

&quot;Bumblebees fly and Scientologists are using the E-Meter to solve the world’s problems on a daily basis.&quot; Hah!

&quot;But, anyone and I do mean anyone can learn to use an E-Meter.&quot; Case in point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, if someone wanted to make a great parody article about how Scientologists are stereotyped by internet denizens, all they would need to do is copy and paste this exact article &#8211; word for word.</p>
<p>&#8220;Bumblebees fly and Scientologists are using the E-Meter to solve the world’s problems on a daily basis.&#8221; Hah!</p>
<p>&#8220;But, anyone and I do mean anyone can learn to use an E-Meter.&#8221; Case in point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asif</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>asif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Actually..   You are wrong. 

Educate yourself (those who are permitted.  To those who aren&#039;t.. I&#039;m so sorry.)

http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040911/mathtrek.asp

http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a5_045.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually..   You are wrong. </p>
<p>Educate yourself (those who are permitted.  To those who aren&#8217;t.. I&#8217;m so sorry.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040911/mathtrek.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040911/mathtrek.asp</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a5_045.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a5_045.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djbjbfbwf</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>djbjbfbwf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Ok, so engineers cannot understand why the bumblebee works, therefore the e-meter must be correct. That argument is so weak I am actually wondering if this is a wind-up. Attacking the validity of the e-meter is not a violation of religious freedom, it is a very valid response to a piece of technology which has had no independent peer review, no double-blind tests, no proper research at all.

I wonder at how ridiculous this all seems and how anyone can take it seriously, then I realise that it is the way of all religions. Feel free to practice whatever belief you like, but one: do not stifle criticism, if you do it will be your downfall, two: be honest about the reality of Scientology, don&#039;t wait till people are fully indoctrinated to tell them all the stuff about nuking volcanoes and Xenu etc. and 3: do not use suppressive tactics or litigious methods, you will only win enemies.

Oh yes, and explain Lisa McPhearson...

Knowledge is free.

Salvation has no price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so engineers cannot understand why the bumblebee works, therefore the e-meter must be correct. That argument is so weak I am actually wondering if this is a wind-up. Attacking the validity of the e-meter is not a violation of religious freedom, it is a very valid response to a piece of technology which has had no independent peer review, no double-blind tests, no proper research at all.</p>
<p>I wonder at how ridiculous this all seems and how anyone can take it seriously, then I realise that it is the way of all religions. Feel free to practice whatever belief you like, but one: do not stifle criticism, if you do it will be your downfall, two: be honest about the reality of Scientology, don&#8217;t wait till people are fully indoctrinated to tell them all the stuff about nuking volcanoes and Xenu etc. and 3: do not use suppressive tactics or litigious methods, you will only win enemies.</p>
<p>Oh yes, and explain Lisa McPhearson&#8230;</p>
<p>Knowledge is free.</p>
<p>Salvation has no price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonXenu</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>AnonXenu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Is that serious? This is all satire, right?

&quot;Electrical engineers still can’t make a cell phone that doesn’t drop signals.&quot;
Outside cause, not the cellphone&#039;s fault.

&quot;Aviation engineers still can’t make a plane that won’t crash.&quot;
And I&#039;m sure if I take a sledge hammer to your E-Meter, it&#039;ll be a-okay.

&quot;Chemical engineers still can’t make gasoline out of water.&quot;
...Alchemy? Never tried it.

&quot;Computer engineers still can’t make a computer that cannot detect hate mail from pederasts.&quot;
...I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve made a few programmers cringe.

&quot;Mechanical engineers still can’t make a car that won’t pollute.&quot;
Already done...just not all that efficient.


And as a response to all you&#039;ve said:
Neither can a Scientologist




Ignorant SciFag is Ignorant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that serious? This is all satire, right?</p>
<p>&#8220;Electrical engineers still can’t make a cell phone that doesn’t drop signals.&#8221;<br />
Outside cause, not the cellphone&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>&#8220;Aviation engineers still can’t make a plane that won’t crash.&#8221;<br />
And I&#8217;m sure if I take a sledge hammer to your E-Meter, it&#8217;ll be a-okay.</p>
<p>&#8220;Chemical engineers still can’t make gasoline out of water.&#8221;<br />
&#8230;Alchemy? Never tried it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Computer engineers still can’t make a computer that cannot detect hate mail from pederasts.&#8221;<br />
&#8230;I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve made a few programmers cringe.</p>
<p>&#8220;Mechanical engineers still can’t make a car that won’t pollute.&#8221;<br />
Already done&#8230;just not all that efficient.</p>
<p>And as a response to all you&#8217;ve said:<br />
Neither can a Scientologist</p>
<p>Ignorant SciFag is Ignorant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xenu</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>xenu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>i think the crude emeter was  regarded as an open source lie detector, then hubbard pulled a bill gates and stole someone elses invention (popular mechanics) and patented it, in the 50&#039;s, and you fools think it&#039;s high tech.

Do this, go to college, get a degree in Electrical Engineering, then tell me if you still think the emeter does anything. Or, get a degree in psychology, then you&#039;ll see that you&#039;re being brainwashed at every audit.

Or dont listen to me. talk to a freezoner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the crude emeter was  regarded as an open source lie detector, then hubbard pulled a bill gates and stole someone elses invention (popular mechanics) and patented it, in the 50&#8217;s, and you fools think it&#8217;s high tech.</p>
<p>Do this, go to college, get a degree in Electrical Engineering, then tell me if you still think the emeter does anything. Or, get a degree in psychology, then you&#8217;ll see that you&#8217;re being brainwashed at every audit.</p>
<p>Or dont listen to me. talk to a freezoner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingo Swann</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingo Swann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Just so as they said my work at Stanford did not work either.  The technology of Scientology has the potential of being the next stepping stone for humanity.

I. Swann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so as they said my work at Stanford did not work either.  The technology of Scientology has the potential of being the next stepping stone for humanity.</p>
<p>I. Swann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OPTIMUS PRIME</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>OPTIMUS PRIME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreedomwatch.wordpress.com/2007/08/26/they-said-it-would-not-work/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Scientology invented Bumblebee?  I think not.

Optimus Prime</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientology invented Bumblebee?  I think not.</p>
<p>Optimus Prime</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
